coca-cola.com
Gemini · gemini-2.5-flash · HTTP · Target coca-cola.comA measurement at one moment, not a verdict · MethodologyWhile AI agents can access the Coca-Cola website, the absence of structural files and poor internal linking causes a 70 percent failure or partial success rate across standard tasks.
Remove challenge and login walls+862 → 70
All of them together: 93 (A)
Projected from the audit record. After fixing, re-run the task or re-measure to confirm.
AI agents can successfully access the homepage without being blocked, but they struggle to navigate the site effectively. The absence of foundational routing files like /llms.txt and /sitemap.xml forces agents to guess URLs or rely heavily on external search engines. While tasks like shipping, support, and signup succeeded, agents failed completely on 5 out of 10 intents, including stock, contact, and product comparisons. Furthermore, for half of the tasks, agents did not cite Coca-Cola's own URLs, meaning users are receiving information from third-party sources rather than the brand itself.
What works
- The homepage is fully accessible to bots with a healthy HTTP 200 status and no bot-blocking mechanisms.
- Agents successfully completed shipping, support, and signup tasks using the site's own URLs.
- The site maintains a high overall reliability score of 88 percent, meaning agents rarely encounter broken pages when navigating natively.
What to fix
For each item: its current state, why it matters, how to fix it and how to check. The same content comes as files you can hand straight to whoever does the work.
Putting the items together…
Fix files
Files generated from this audit. Paste them in, or hand them to a coding agent. Have someone review them before they go live.
Building the fix files…
Detailed results
The results behind the score, and the measurement record.
Evidence
- homepage HTTP 200
- redirect hops: 2
Evidence
- robots.txt contains Disallow rules
- A CAPTCHA is holding the content back: reCAPTCHA
- Cookie consent banner: OneTrust
- First byte after 298ms
Evidence
- /llms.txt — absent (HTTP 404)
- /llms-full.txt — absent (HTTP 404)
- /sitemap.xml — absent (HTTP 404)
- /sitemap-index.xml — absent (HTTP 404)
- /sitemap_index.xml — absent (HTTP 404)
- /robots.txt — present
Evidence
- 32 links in the raw HTML
Evidence
- outcome success · verdict partial
- the final answer cited this site
- site-guided navigation 0%
- 2xx rate 100%
- done_big_detour
Evidence
- outcome success · verdict full
- the final answer cited this site
- site-guided navigation 80%
- 2xx rate 100%
- done_unaided
Evidence
- outcome success · verdict failed
- the final answer cited no URL from this site
- site-guided navigation 0%
- 2xx rate 0%
- done_small_detour
Evidence
- outcome success · verdict full
- the final answer cited this site
- site-guided navigation 0%
- 2xx rate 100%
- done_big_detour
Evidence
- outcome success · verdict failed
- the final answer cited no URL from this site
- site-guided navigation 0%
- 2xx rate 100%
- done_big_detour
Evidence
- outcome success · verdict partial
- the final answer cited this site
- site-guided navigation 0%
- 2xx rate 100%
- done_big_detour
Evidence
- outcome success · verdict failed
- the final answer cited no URL from this site
- site-guided navigation 50%
- 2xx rate 100%
- done_big_detour
Evidence
- outcome success · verdict failed
- the final answer cited no URL from this site
- site-guided navigation 0%
- 2xx rate 100%
- done_big_detour
Evidence
- outcome success · verdict failed
- the final answer cited no URL from this site
- site-guided navigation 75%
- 2xx rate 100%
- done_small_detour
Evidence
- outcome success · verdict full
- the final answer cited this site
- site-guided navigation 40%
- 2xx rate 80%
- done_small_detour
WebMCP — what the site declares about itself
This audit ran with the WebMCP check switched off. That does not mean there are no tools — it means we did not look. Turn on "Check WebMCP" when re-auditing.
Act-stage check (nothing submitted)
Checks whether an agent could fill in the forms and press the buttons, up to the point of pressing. No form was submitted, nothing added to a cart, nothing paid. Report only; not scored.
Per-task results
| Task | Verdict | Own-site share | Request success | Followed guidance | Cited own site | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| find pricing | Partial | 100% | 100% | 0% | Yes | |
| shipping & returns | Full | 60% | 100% | 80% | Yes | |
| is it available | Failed | 0% | 0% | 0% | No | |
| get support | Full | 100% | 100% | 0% | Yes | |
| contact a human | Failed | 33% | 100% | 0% | No | |
| refund policy | Partial | 100% | 100% | 0% | Yes | |
| compare two options | Failed | 0% | 100% | 50% | No | |
| latest notice | Failed | 0% | 100% | 0% | No | |
| find a branch | Failed | 0% | 100% | 75% | No | |
| create an account | Full | 100% | 80% | 40% | Yes |
About this report
- Measured
- 9/10/2026, 9:14:59 PM GMT+9
- Engine
- Gemini · gemini-2.5-flash · HTTP
This is what AI agents could do on the site at the time above, measured by actually using it. It is not a verdict on the site or the company, and the result can change when the site does.